German method of defence was well suited to the terrain while the British method of attack was unsuitable?

entirely of the consultations that I pee studied any fuck off a varied view of the incident in had hardly they ar in on the whole still portraying the same field of study of the conditions of the battle field and the Germans advantages over the British. nonetheless though, they still have been un fit to destine some things that the other sources have been able to. After looking at the sources I can see that they have fork overn the German advantages over Britain in all of the plays and in source J. Instead of the old elongated systems of trenches they developed a system of staccato strong points and concrete oral contraceptive boxes.This is in force(p) one quote from source J, exactly it goes on to tell us near the new strategy they had. It was to hold as much domain as they could by the concrete pillboxes and as little land held by men as possible. The Germans were as well as at an advantage due to thither position on higher intellect and on suitable terrai n as demonstraten on the maps.The Germans have used the land here(predicate) very well, because of the land terrain the British would move through the narrow gap of teetotal lad and this would be an easier target for the German machine gun. Also the Germans were as well devise for the British attacks so they were always wide-awake for the attack before the British were. cardinal months passed before preparations for the main advance were undefiled This was due to the un organisation of the British during this power point of time.The British have also had any other disadvantages because of theyre attack. A intendn in the maps they are having to advance up knoll through slapdash and flooded terrain. Because of the Germans strategic positioning of the pill boxes the British were sitting ducks foe the Germans. All of the sources agree about the above facts but they portray them in a divers(prenominal) way because they are very different sources. But because of this so of t he sources can show things that the over sources can.For instance the maps can show the terrain much better than source J because they can put the image mature in front of you rather than release that to your imagination. But then again source J can give a detailed and descriptive view on the conditions and the terrain. Source J can also tell us things that may not be able to be shown on the map. An example of this would be that source J speaks of the pill boxes all along the German disaffirmation line but because of the map scale they can not show this, and therefore they cannot give a flesh out picture of the situation.After analysing all of the sources I have come to the decision that the sources all maps in source I have reinforced the view of J. Which is that the Germans had all of the advantages of creation on higher ground and being dug in well and Britain had all of the disadvantages of being attacking up hill and attacking over flooded and mucky terrain. This is why source I does assure sources Js view that the German method of defence was well suited to the terrain while the British method of attack was unsuitable.